Troia is accelerating real-time proving with $300k in grants. (opens in a new tab)

guests

track EVM implementation diversity for defense-in-depth resilience

critical
diversity status
dominant guest program
revm 76.3 %
revm
76.3 %
zilkworm
23.5 %
evmone
0.1 %
guest diversity, current
share of proofs by guest program (7d)
critical — revm represents 76 % of all proofs
76.3 % revm
revm
76.3 %
zilkworm
23.5 %
evmone
0.1 %
< 50 % healthy
50 - 75 % warning
> 75 % critical

Key insight: No single guest should dominate proof generation. A diverse ecosystem ensures that a bug or vulnerability in one EVM implementation doesn 't compromise the entire proving network.

guest diversity, trend
guest program share of proofs — tracking concentration trends
trend:
stable
revm now: 71.1 %
50 % warning
75 % critical

Key insight: A healthy ecosystem shows converging bands. If the dominant guest 's area shrinks while others grow, we 're building defense-in-depth. Trend is determined by comparing the largest guest 's share over the first vs last 4 weeks — above 75 % is always concentrating.

guests, active
revm
6 / 9 provers
Rust
Tempo
Ethereum L1
MIT
zilkworm
2 / 9 provers
C++
Zilkworm
Ethereum L1
Apache 2.0
evmone
1 / 9 provers
C++
Ipsilon
Ethereum L1
Apache 2.0
guests, inactive
levm
0 / 9 provers
Rust
LambdaClass
Ethereum L1
Apache 2.0
ZKsync OS
0 / 9 provers
Rust
Matter Labs
ZKsync L2
Apache 2.0; MIT
made with by the Ethereum Foundation